- Home Page
- by Tom Lynch
Eyewitness of Flight 587 Crash
- Six citizens have requested to testify at the first NTSB
Public Hearing on flight 587; isn't it strange? That witnesses
request to testify? We do this because the NTSB
is not publicly acknowledging the many eyewitness accounts (up
to 25) of in-flight fire or explosion, many of which are adamant
that the fire/explosion occurred before any tail or engine breakups.
The NTSB has thus far deemed this crash as an accident not having
explained yet the sequence of events or how a fire or explosion
can be present in-flight and not have this raise suspicions of
possible foul play or some other catastrophic failure beyond
the tail. If the NTSB had maintained objectivity they would not
have said the crash was being treated as an accident when there
seems to be sufficient reason to at least suspect foul play.
"Sometimes one needs to ask a cab driver to get the facts"
stated Patrick Moynihan. We'll ask most people what they think
about this crash and the reply is "something's up".
As we are at war with terrorists, the luxury we don't have
is time, and the year or two that it may take to determine the
cause of this crash is unacceptable in this time of conflict.
Some of us had the misfortune of being eyewitnesses to the
explosions, fire, and breaking apart of Flight 587. We know that
our senses are subject to different interpretations and that there
may be some discrepancies, but if the justice system regarded
witnesses in criminal trials as witnesses seem to be regarded
in the Flight 587 NTSB investigation, then probably ninety present
of criminal convictions would never have happened.
Truth, Justice and the American Way.
your email to the Editor. Please
provide your full name, city, and state. Thanks for your comments!